IRC Log for #openid on 2008-02-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- [00:04:22] * Mitsurugi (n=Nightmar@4.Red-81-39-197.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) has joined #openID
- [00:10:47] * Cody`macbook (n=Cody@74-129-166-74.dhcp.insightbb.com) has joined #openid
- [00:15:59] * mario (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [00:19:25] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [00:36:28] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [00:37:00] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [00:42:06] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [00:49:28] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [01:00:15] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [01:00:21] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [01:08:23] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [01:20:25] * ffm (n=ffm@unaffiliated/ffm) has joined #openid
- [01:20:34] <ffm>
What is there to stop ID reuse?
- [01:25:34] * michelp_ (n=michelp@69-30-72-119.dq1sf.easystreet.com) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [01:30:32] <tjohns>
What do you mean by reuse?
- [01:35:09] <ffm>
tjohns: lets say alice trusts BobWorks to be her openID provider.
- [01:35:30] <ffm>
tjohns: One day, BobWorks needs more cash, so they let Cathy pay to masquarade as Alice.
- [01:35:37] <ffm>
tjohns: anything to stop that>
- [01:36:09] <tjohns>
No, the provider is implicitly trusted.
- [01:36:38] <tjohns>
However, Alice could use alice.com as her OpenID URL, then use delegation to have BobWorks serve as her provider
- [01:36:44] <ffm>
tjohns: how about if BobWorks goes out of buisness,
- [01:37:03] <ffm>
tjohns: and someone else buys bobworks.com and pretends to be alice?
- [01:37:20] <ffm>
tjohns: anything in the form of a secret token or something that stops that?
- [01:37:21] <tjohns>
If she finds out that BobWorks allowed her account to become compromised, she could just change the delegation settings on alice.com
- [01:37:33] <tjohns>
Nope, same situation. The best defense is to use delegation.
- [01:37:39] <ffm>
tjohns: kk
- [01:50:35] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [02:06:55] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [02:45:32] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [02:51:17] <donomo>
openid scheduled downtime.
- [02:51:55] <donomo>
that gets me thinking about redundancy
- [02:52:17] <donomo>
either mine or openid's
- [02:52:25] <donomo>
im pretty hosed while its down.
- [02:56:58] <ffm>
donomo: it's only 6 hrs
- [02:57:04] <ffm>
donomo: and that's why we delegate
- [03:14:36] * SignpostMarv (n=Signpost@82-71-31-169.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk) has joined #openid
- [03:29:28] * ffm (n=ffm@unaffiliated/ffm) Quit ("Leaving.")
- [03:45:06] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [03:48:02] * SignpostMarv (n=Signpost@82-71-31-169.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk) Quit ("Leaving")
- [03:48:19] * shigeta (n=shigeta@70.36.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp) has joined #openid
- [03:57:10] * priidu (n=aa@220.201.181.147) has joined #openid
- [04:06:52] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [04:06:52] <donomo>
if openid were the way into my email, 6 hours would seem like a long time.
- [04:07:26] <donomo>
delegation is a big step up, tech-wise, and not available to the average myopenid user
- [04:11:21] * priidu__ (n=aa@220.192.242.177) has joined #openid
- [04:20:12] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [04:21:24] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [04:24:59] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [04:27:24] * priidu (n=aa@220.201.181.147) Quit (No route to host)
- [04:38:43] <tjohns>
donomo: There are methods that can be used to eliminate downtime, just like for any other site. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a market for high availability OpenID hosting right now.
- [04:39:33] <donomo>
tjohns: yup.
- [04:39:52] <donomo>
delegation is a powerful option for openid users
- [04:43:24] <flaccid__>
i just can't wait to finish this prototype
- [05:25:03] <donomo>
flaccid__: what is it?
- [05:28:15] * priidu__ (n=aa@220.192.242.177) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [05:29:14] <flaccid__>
openid server in cakephp
- [05:31:17] * priidu__ (n=aa@220.192.241.198) has joined #openid
- [06:20:44] * priidu__ (n=aa@220.192.241.198) Quit (No route to host)
- [06:22:25] * forsaken (n=eric@c-71-62-234-185.hsd1.va.comcast.net) has joined #openid
- [07:21:50] * polyonymous (n=hacker@pD953B069.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) Quit (Read error: 101 (Network is unreachable))
- [07:21:51] * polyonymous_ (n=hacker@pD9538E38.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #openid
- [07:53:58] * bcardarella (n=brian@c-65-96-64-87.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined #openid
- [07:57:45] <bcardarella>
I seem to be getting an odd error.... for some reason my server is throwing out a "Status: 500 Internal Server Error" when the Consumer first speaks to the server....
- [08:05:09] * bcardarella (n=brian@c-65-96-64-87.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) Quit ("Leaving.")
- [08:16:09] * shigeta (n=shigeta@70.36.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp) Quit ("Leaving...")
- [08:42:17] <keturn>
who scheduled six hours?
- [08:43:26] * tjohns (n=tjohns@cpe-76-170-58-80.socal.res.rr.com) Quit ()
- [09:08:07] * mario_ (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) has joined #openid
- [09:08:09] * mario_ is now known as mario
- [09:27:39] * mario (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [10:09:22] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- [10:28:43] * flaccid (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [10:43:06] * isak (n=isak@20.31.227.87.static.dre.siw.siwnet.net) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
- [10:43:32] * isak (n=isak@20.31.227.87.static.dre.siw.siwnet.net) has joined #openid
- [11:12:26] * shigeta (n=shigeta@70.36.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp) has joined #openid
- [11:16:09] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) has joined #openid
- [11:31:36] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) Quit ("Leaving")
- [11:40:43] * priidu (n=aa@220.195.51.227) has joined #openid
- [12:06:47] * walkah (n=walkah@drupal.org/user/1531/view) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [12:21:16] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [12:27:46] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) Quit ()
- [12:27:51] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [12:33:05] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [12:33:05] * flaccid (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- [12:44:33] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [12:56:53] * priidu (n=aa@220.195.51.227) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [13:03:33] * flaccid0s (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [13:06:01] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [13:10:25] * mario_ (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) has joined #openid
- [13:10:27] * mario_ is now known as mario
- [13:16:45] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [13:27:14] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) Quit ()
- [13:28:08] * flaccid0s is now known as flaccid
- [13:31:13] * mario (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [13:37:02] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [13:43:29] * priidu_ (n=aa@220.205.83.31) has joined #openid
- [13:51:14] * flaccid (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [14:16:11] * anchovyman (n=shane@124-171-154-38.dyn.iinet.net.au) has joined #openid
- [14:17:09] <anchovyman>
I have an OpenID question - does anyone know what the error: Verification of <myopenid> failed: No matching endpoint found after discovering <myopenid>
- [14:17:46] <flaccid_>
i guess that means that yadis discovery did not return a server entity
- [14:18:31] <anchovyman>
really? I am seeing this on the service provider after the checkid_setup
- [14:18:45] <flaccid_>
im new, i could be wrong anchovyman
- [14:19:05] <flaccid_>
but the word 'matching' is probably the problem
- [14:19:23] <flaccid_>
what is it matching. sorry my knowledge is not great yet on openid
- [14:19:45] <flaccid_>
i would love to be corrected in this channel :)
- [14:20:01] <anchovyman>
well that's part of my question really - I don't know what it's trying to do.
- [14:20:14] <anchovyman>
I have control over the OP in this case, not the service provider.
- [14:22:05] <anchovyman>
and it doesn't happen if I turn my openid provider into a 1.1-only server. It seems to be an artifact of OpenID 2.0 support that I haven't figured out yet.
- [14:22:51] <flaccid_>
hmm
- [14:22:58] <flaccid_>
out of my knowledge
- [14:23:05] <flaccid_>
but in this case what is the service provider?
- [14:23:41] <anchovyman>
I have two where its happening - I guess they use the same code. Both are run by JanRain, and I have a contact there, so I may just email them.
- [14:23:57] <anchovyman>
https://pibb.com/ and http://jyte.com/
- [14:24:32] <flaccid_>
im a bit confused
- [14:24:52] <flaccid_>
do you mean relying partying or consumer in this case?
- [14:25:06] <flaccid_>
just keep in mind i've had a few scotches
- [14:25:43] <anchovyman>
in my terminology they mean the same thing. I have control of an OpenID provider, and at those aforementioned relying parties (aka consumers) I see the error I mentioned.
- [14:26:07] <flaccid_>
yeah consumer is a deprecated term now
- [14:26:41] <flaccid_>
so this is happening with these two janrain relying parties ?
- [14:26:55] <anchovyman>
yes
- [14:27:13] <flaccid_>
and is fine with other relying parties?
- [14:27:42] <anchovyman>
with several others I've tried - though there's no guarantee that those others were OpenID 2.0 enabled RP's
- [14:27:57] <flaccid_>
RP ?
- [14:27:59] <flaccid_>
oh yeah
- [14:28:00] <flaccid_>
lol
- [14:28:03] <flaccid_>
..scotch
- [14:28:15] <flaccid_>
yeah there is not many 2.0 providers out there
- [14:28:19] <flaccid_>
im building mine atm
- [14:28:54] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) has joined #openid
- [14:29:12] <flaccid_>
if you can't find anything differing from the protocol then i guess is janrain contact
- [14:29:16] * priidu_ (n=aa@220.205.83.31) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [14:29:19] <flaccid_>
is=its
- [14:29:36] * mario_ (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) has joined #openid
- [14:29:37] * mario_ is now known as mario
- [14:29:51] <anchovyman>
they must be doing some kinda check after the checkid_setup response, but I don't know what it is
- [14:30:16] <flaccid_>
hmm interesting
- [14:30:24] <flaccid_>
i'd like to hear about that if thats the case
- [14:30:41] <flaccid_>
couldn't be anything to do with their anti-phishing ?
- [14:30:51] <anchovyman>
google "No matching endpoint found after discovering" and you'll see a couple of mentions of it, but I can't correlate to my own scenario yet
- [14:31:17] <flaccid_>
what exactly is outputting that string but
- [14:31:24] * Cody`macbook (n=Cody@74-129-166-74.dhcp.insightbb.com) Quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- [14:31:29] <flaccid_>
is that string written by the libraries or someone else
- [14:32:03] <anchovyman>
who knows - I just see it on the RP website, and from trace on my OP (and looking at what my browser is doing) I can tell that I've sent the checkid_setup response successfully.
- [14:32:18] <flaccid_>
anchovyman: did you see http://trac.openidenabled.com/trac/ticket/95
- [14:32:28] <anchovyman>
yes
- [14:32:30] <flaccid_>
your nick is familiar anchovyman lol
- [14:32:43] <anchovyman>
really - where from :) ?
- [14:33:00] <flaccid_>
imo its likely a bug or some problem. i've had a few in my dev so far that i need to report back, one is still puzzling me
- [14:33:05] <flaccid_>
i guess on freenode somewhere
- [14:33:12] <anchovyman>
higgins perhaps?
- [14:33:22] <flaccid_>
no idea
- [14:33:27] <flaccid_>
hehe
- [14:33:37] <flaccid_>
good ol freenode of familar nicks who knows when you talked to them lol
- [14:48:01] * ricky (n=ricky@fedora/ricky) Quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- [14:48:01] * keturn (n=kevint@pdpc/supporter/sustaining/keturn) Quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- [14:48:53] * ricky (n=ricky@fedora/ricky) has joined #openid
- [14:48:53] * keturn (n=kevint@pdpc/supporter/sustaining/keturn) has joined #openid
- [14:51:18] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) Quit ("Leaving")
- [15:12:08] <anchovyman>
i figured it out
- [15:12:25] <flaccid_>
serious?
- [15:12:29] <flaccid_>
do tell
- [15:12:43] <anchovyman>
yeah - it has to do with section 11.2 of the openid 2.0 spec
- [15:12:56] * flaccid_ gets out his folder
- [15:13:23] * shigeta (n=shigeta@70.36.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp) Quit ("Leaving...")
- [15:13:43] <flaccid_>
"Verifying Discovered Information" ?
- [15:13:47] <anchovyman>
what i did wrong was that i was returning my op_endpoint with https as the protocol whereas the identity page had http (mismatched protocols)
- [15:13:57] <anchovyman>
now it works fine
- [15:14:38] <flaccid_>
ah
- [15:14:47] <flaccid_>
easy
- [15:14:55] <flaccid_>
i was reading that and going omg wtf
- [15:14:56] <flaccid_>
lol
- [15:15:47] <anchovyman>
1:15am here - gotta turn in
- [15:15:52] <flaccid_>
hey anchovyman, what is your take on https with openid. should be be mandated to do https for auth
- [15:16:02] <anchovyman>
yeah i think so
- [15:16:04] <flaccid_>
its 2:15am here lol
- [15:16:15] <anchovyman>
i am going to allow config to restrict to https
- [15:16:16] <flaccid_>
true
- [15:16:21] <anchovyman>
with ssl validation
- [15:16:26] <flaccid_>
i think i'lll do that too on release
- [15:16:32] <flaccid_>
ssl validation?
- [15:16:47] <anchovyman>
however problem is my test endpoint doesn't have a "real" cert, so rp's don't trust it hence I'm kinda https enabled
- [15:17:13] <anchovyman>
my RP is going to have the ability to ensure that the OP's SSL endpoint is in it's trusted signers list (like a browser does)
- [15:17:27] <anchovyman>
that's in addition to requiring the OP to have an SSL endpoint
- [15:17:27] <flaccid_>
hmmm
- [15:17:38] <flaccid_>
wtf
- [15:17:58] <anchovyman>
so the RP will not connect to an OP unless it trusts the SSL certificate of that OP
- [15:17:58] <flaccid_>
imo thats making things complicated
- [15:18:11] <flaccid_>
but what do you mean by 'trust'
- [15:18:36] <anchovyman>
the SSL cert of the OP must be signed by a certificate in our keystore
- [15:18:46] <flaccid_>
what is 'our keystore'
- [15:18:50] <anchovyman>
configuration
- [15:18:55] <flaccid_>
um
- [15:19:08] <flaccid_>
if the CA can be verified, what else i there to verify?
- [15:19:18] <anchovyman>
you're saying the same thing
- [15:19:28] <anchovyman>
how do you verify a CA?
- [15:19:36] <flaccid_>
by root certs
- [15:19:41] <flaccid_>
or authorities
- [15:19:44] <anchovyman>
that's exactly what I'm saying
- [15:19:49] <flaccid_>
ok np
- [15:20:07] <flaccid_>
so all you are saying is that if the TLS cert is valid then ok coo
- [15:20:10] <flaccid_>
cool
- [15:20:34] <anchovyman>
so our RP will have a certificate store with CA's in it. It will have configuration to restrict connection to OP's that support SSL, and then only those endpoints which are issued by a trusted CA will be usable.
- [15:20:39] <flaccid_>
the 'in our keystore' is the part that made me flip out
- [15:21:01] * flaccid_ thinks
- [15:21:15] <anchovyman>
that's just like how a browser does warnings about SSL sites that don't have certs signed by trusted CA's
- [15:21:27] <flaccid_>
yes
- [15:21:36] <anchovyman>
anyway, I am *really* going to turn in now
- [15:21:48] * anchovyman (n=shane@124-171-154-38.dyn.iinet.net.au) has left #openid
- [15:22:15] <flaccid_>
but my question to you is does the 2.0 spec advise mandatory TLS/SSL, no it doesn't. if it did then the crypto implementation would be irrelevant..
- [15:22:26] <flaccid_>
ah well
- [15:22:59] * mario (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [15:24:57] <flaccid_>
question is. what responsibility does OpenID have ont the actual encryption of data. does it need to past its auth objectives?
- [15:26:05] <flaccid_>
i mean my point is that openid was achievable without an encrypto layer.
- [15:26:16] <flaccid_>
correct me if im wrong
- [15:39:15] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [15:50:54] * hillsy (i=shaunh@npfit2.dh.bytemark.co.uk) has joined #openid
- [15:55:19] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [16:00:22] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [16:08:07] * hillsy (i=shaunh@npfit2.dh.bytemark.co.uk) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
- [16:12:49] * Rpg2 (n=Ramha@p50847572.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [16:12:52] <Rpg2>
Hi
- [16:16:44] * flacccid (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [16:28:56] * flacccid is now known as flaccid
- [16:35:26] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [16:44:24] * Rpg2 (n=Ramha@p50847572.dip.t-dialin.net) Quit ()
- [16:44:37] * Rpg2 (n=Ramha@p50847572.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [16:49:01] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) Quit ()
- [17:19:06] * pvandewyngaerde (n=pvandewy@150.93-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) has joined #openid
- [17:23:03] * Ramha (n=Ramha@p50845692.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [17:36:05] * Rpg2 (n=Ramha@p50847572.dip.t-dialin.net) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [17:40:47] * idnar (i=mithrand@unaffiliated/idnar) Quit (Nick collision from services.)
- [17:40:49] * idnar_ (i=mithrand@unaffiliated/idnar) has joined #openid
- [17:50:08] * hillsy (i=shaunh@npfit2.dh.bytemark.co.uk) has joined #openid
- [17:53:02] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #openid
- [17:59:54] <keturn>
flaccid: You can do OpenID without _en_crypting anything. but the messages are cryptographically signed.
- [18:00:38] <keturn>
so the content is not concealed, but you can detect tampering.
- [18:00:39] * MrTopf (n=cs@pD9EBD09F.dip.t-dialin.net) Quit ()
- [18:15:59] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [18:24:07] * hillsy (i=shaunh@npfit2.dh.bytemark.co.uk) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
- [18:31:25] * flaccid (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Connection timed out)
- [18:39:10] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) has joined #openid
- [18:53:28] * pvandewyngaerde (n=pvandewy@150.93-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
- [19:00:16] * idnar_ is now known as idnar
- [19:44:25] * Ramha (n=Ramha@p50845692.dip.t-dialin.net) has left #openid
- [19:49:10] * hendry (n=hendry@nox.vm.bytemark.co.uk) has joined #openid
- [19:49:10] <jibot>
hendry is http://www.flickr.com/photos/hendry/1858868124/ and http://hendry.iki.fi/about/
- [19:49:41] <hendry>
any good examples of openid 2.0 consumers?
- [19:52:56] * a9913_ (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) has joined #openid
- [19:58:02] <keturn>
https://pibb.com/ and http://jyte.com/ are both 2.0 consumers. or, if you're looking for code, any of the 2.x libraries on http://openidenabled.com/ support OpenID 2.0 and examples are included in the source distribution.
- [20:10:11] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- [20:28:37] <hendry>
keturn: wondering if there was a particularly good listing of 2.0 compliant ones
- [20:44:10] <keturn>
Yahoo has this list, which only has 2.0 in it because that's all Yahoo supports. http://gallery.yahoo.com/openid
- [20:45:11] <hendry>
i am testing the version 2.0 server PHP examples
- [20:45:50] <hendry>
and it can't seem to handle a "2.0 identity" like http://id/server/server.php
- [20:46:43] <hendry>
the trust page works but then the next page presents the " * You must be logged in as http://id/server/server.php to approve this request.
- [20:46:52] <hendry>
which is a fail
- [21:04:00] * priidu_ (n=aa@220.195.52.211) has joined #openid
- [21:12:19] <hendry>
keturn: http://flickr.com/photos/hendry/2240297218/
- [21:13:38] <keturn>
ok, that's probably a bug in the php example
- [21:19:00] <hendry>
yeah
- [21:19:08] <hendry>
the PHP example could be a lot simpler i think
- [21:19:23] <hendry>
i don't see the point of all that sprintf render/ stuff
- [21:19:40] <hendry>
just use PHP like it's a templating language itself ;)
- [21:20:14] <hendry>
i'll try figure it out tomorrow, but if you see how to fix please let me know asap keturn
- [21:22:54] * tjohns (n=tjohns@cpe-76-170-58-80.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #openid
- [21:29:06] * mario_ (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) has joined #openid
- [21:29:08] * mario_ is now known as mario
- [21:30:29] * Osurac (i=mikeg@adsl-074-182-167-053.sip.hsv.bellsouth.net) has joined #openid
- [21:45:13] * mario (n=chatzill@89.241.154.67) Quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.80 [Firefox 3.0b2/2007121014]")
- [21:51:45] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [22:06:42] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [22:07:11] * flaccid_ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) has joined #openid
- [22:08:48] * a9913_ (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) Quit ("Leaving")
- [22:24:16] * flaccid__ (n=flaccid@123-243-80-114.tpgi.com.au) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [22:29:30] * Mitsurugi (n=Nightmar@4.Red-81-39-197.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- [22:30:02] * Mitsurugi (n=Nightmar@162.Red-83-61-239.staticIP.rima-tde.net) has joined #openID
- [22:39:34] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) has joined #openid
- [22:44:40] * a9913 (n=a9913@unaffiliated/a9913) Quit (Client Quit)
- [23:46:37] * anchovyman (n=shane@nat/ibm/x-c843c211ec5fcbf4) has joined #openid
These logs were automatically created by OpenIDlogbot on
chat.freenode.net
using a modified version of the Java IRC LogBot.